![]() Something to think about in the long term for when you have some cash on hand, because it's leagues beyond Musescore in just about every way. It may not be free, but it's surprisingly cheap and has a free trial if you want to get acquainted with it. Still, I do recommend checking out Dorico. But I understand that my needs aren't the same as everyone else's. So for me, Dorico and Sibelius are similarly good, and Musescore doesn't come even close. But I just can't commit the extra hours it takes to manually engrave so many elements that are handled automatically by Sibelius - or especially Dorico, which I've started using more recently.ĭorico has some quirks that annoy me a bit after using Sibelius, but I've come to hugely appreciate some conveniences of the note input system, popovers, and the best default engraving of any of these apps plus arguably the best manual engraving features. ![]() It seems like Musescore is steadily improving. I should be charitable - since the last time I tried and failed to love Musescore, the default music font has changed and lots of little tweaks have been made. And most importantly for me, the notation doesn't look that great by default. ![]() And it's just so clunky and unpleasant even to this day, and the side panels are cluttered and unhelpful. I heard people start talking about Musescore more after I hadn't used it for a decade, so I came back to try it. I've used Sibelius for ages, and note input with the keyboard using the keypad is ridiculously fast, and the engraving looks quite good by default. But I have to admit that, for me at least, Musescore is nearly as bad. I personally find Finale infuriating - the note input method just doesn't mesh with my brain, though to be fair I didn't give it too much of a chance. It is compatible with most VSTs as well as NotePerformer.Īs a student, you can get a steep discount, but even the free version lets you use two instruments (without Engrave mode). that just contains the same content of Flute 1 and Flute 2 - Dorico generates it on-the-fly, and it never goes out of sync. I don't need to have a separate staff for Flutes 1.2. Its unrivaled condensing feature is indispensable for preparing music for larger ensembles. Even triplets and other tuplets are handled gracefully when crossing barlines. I generally don't need to adjust things like note rhythms (like combining or separating rests or tied notes) or overlapping voices (like moving simultaneous notes in different voices slightly apart).ĭorico will let you freely move musical content horizontally, and it will adjust the rhythms accordingly. Its engraving defaults are very good, yet deeply adjustable (I usually only need to make minor adjustments). Switched from MuseScore a few years ago and haven't looked back. And so I had second thoughts and looked up what all is actually included in v27 for my cool hundo-fifty, and audibly laughed.Ĭurrently the play I think is to keep v26, and get it going in a virtual machine, just to have Noteperformer available for renders. ![]() Literally the only thing I miss so far is NotePerformer. I can publish my scores online again and retrieve them from anywhere. The audio actually works and doesn't do "exclusive mode". Getting my thoughts out onto the page is faster in every respect, because the computer keyboard based workflow is so much faster (I'm a fast typist), entering notes is faster, articulations are faster, time signatures are faster, expressive directions are faster. I'm firmly in both the tonal and minimalist camp so I don't do a lot of hyper-weirdnessīut man, I'm really impressed. I'm working on a small chamber piece mostly and haven't really tried editing large scale pieces This on top of the fact that I've been getting into Linux and getting out of Microsoft's dumpster fire of an operating system, I thought I would give it another shot. So when my composition teacher chuckled when I asked him whether he wanted a Finale or XML file for Sibelius, and revealed that he used Musescore, I was shocked. Great for people just writing their first few bars, not so great for professional level engraving/writing. Up until now I remembered it fondly as, for the most part, a toy, basically a Noteflight+. I had last used Musescore about 3-4 years ago, at the very start of music school, and had switched to Finale after taking a required semester long course in it and thinking "Meh, I spent the last 6 months learning this software, might as well use it". At the suggestion of my new composition teacher, and upon seeing the 150$ price tag to make my 26 into a 27, I've tried out Musescore, and was thoroughly surprised.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |